

KOMENTARYO
The Tulfo Dynasty and the Question of Accountability

2/18/25, 4:00 PM
The recent disqualification case filed against Senate frontrunner Erwin Tulfo and his family members has reignited the long-standing debate on political dynasties in the Philippines. Attorney Virgilio R. Garcia's petition, submitted to the Commission on Elections (Comelec), challenges the candidacies of Erwin Tulfo, his brother Ben Tulfo, ACT-CIS Representative Jocelyn Tulfo, Quezon City 2nd District Representative Ralph Wendel Tulfo, and Turismo first nominee Wanda Tulfo-Teo. The case cites Article II, Section 26 of the 1987 Constitution, which mandates the state to "guarantee equal access to opportunities for public service and prohibit political dynasties as may be defined by law."
The Absence of an Enabling Law
Despite the constitutional provision, the Philippines has yet to pass an enabling law that explicitly defines and prohibits political dynasties. Erwin Tulfo himself acknowledged this loophole, stating, "Unfortunately, Congress and the Senate have not taken action yet. Until there’s a law, this will continue to happen." This admission underscores a systemic failure—one that benefits entrenched political families at the expense of a more diverse and meritocratic electoral system.
The Pulse Asia survey conducted in January 2025 reveals the political dominance of the Tulfo clan, with Erwin ranking first and Ben placing between third and eighth among senatorial candidates. If both win, they will join their brother, incumbent Senator Raffy Tulfo, in the 20th Congress. Such concentration of power within one family raises concerns about nepotism and conflicts of interest, reinforcing the argument for urgent legislative action against political dynasties.
The Citizenship Controversy
Beyond the dynasty issue, the petition also questions Erwin Tulfo’s eligibility based on his past U.S. citizenship. Tulfo admitted to acquiring American citizenship in the late 1980s and later renouncing it in 2022. However, reports suggest a more troubling narrative—that he allegedly assumed a false identity, "Erich Sylvester Tulfo," to fraudulently obtain U.S. citizenship and a passport.
Documents circulating online, allegedly from the U.S. Embassy in Manila, claim that Tulfo used this identity for over two decades before his passport was revoked in 2022. If true, this would constitute identity theft and passport fraud—serious federal offenses under U.S. law. Yet, instead of addressing these allegations, Tulfo has framed the issue as merely a case of working as an undocumented immigrant in the U.S. This deflection strategy seeks to elicit public sympathy while avoiding accountability for potentially criminal acts.
The Marcos Administration’s Silence
The administration of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has remained silent on Tulfo’s alleged identity fraud, further fueling suspicions of selective justice. While ordinary Filipinos face severe penalties for immigration violations, politically connected individuals appear to evade scrutiny. This double standard undermines public trust and raises concerns about whether the "Bagong Pilipinas" (New Philippines) slogan is merely a repackaging of old political practices.
A Defining Moment for Filipino Voters
As the 2025 elections draw near, Filipino voters must confront a critical question: Should individuals with unresolved allegations of fraud and political opportunism be allowed to hold high office? The Tulfo case serves as a litmus test for the electorate’s willingness to demand integrity and accountability from its leaders.
Political dynasties thrive because of public complacency. If Filipinos continue to elect candidates based on name recall rather than competence and ethical standing, the cycle of corruption and abuse will persist. It is time to challenge the entrenched systems that prioritize familial dominance over genuine public service.
The Tulfo family’s rise to power reflects broader structural flaws in Philippine politics. Without systemic reforms—starting with an anti-dynasty law and strict enforcement of eligibility requirements—the country risks remaining trapped in a cycle where political influence supersedes the rule of law. The choice ultimately lies in the hands of the voters.(Tambuli Ng Bayan-Ronnie Estrada)
For your comments or suggestions, complaints or requests, just send a message through my email at fmesj@yahoo.com or text me at cellphone number-+14086345931
